In reply to:
🗳️ BIDEN OR TRUMP - THE ZIOS WIN 🗳️
@2ysur2ysub
·
390d
The statement in question is a reply to a conversation about political candidates and their stances, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates. The tone of the statement appears defensive and confrontational, addressing a perceived accusation of arrogance related to the speaker's Jewish identity.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm, but its confrontational tone could escalate tensions, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the privacy and dignity of others, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, which is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead takes a defensive and confrontational stance, which is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.