Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/20/2024, 8:39:30 PM
X
In reply to:
🗳️ BIDEN OR TRUMP - THE ZIOS WIN 🗳️
@2ysur2ysub
·
389d
@marwilliamson @DrJillStein I learn from non-Black people about my Black heritage all the time. I don’t think I have a monopoly on facts because I’m Black.

That’s the “arrogance”that I felt coming from you when the interviewer gave you facts you didn’t understand.

I hope I’ve explained myself.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
389d
@2ysur2ysub @DrJillStein You “felt my arrogance about being Jewish?” Whoah!
🗳️ BIDEN OR TRUMP - THE ZIOS WIN 🗳️
@2ysur2ysub
·
389d
For everyone who is now considering @DrJillStein, I will tell you my journey.

I have voted for progressives and have been disappointed by them all.

Then I jumped on the Kennedy bandwagon only to learn that he is a rabid Zionist, who believes the Palestinians are the most… https://twitter.com/2ysur2ysub/s…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about race, heritage, and the interpretation of facts within the context of societal issues. The tone is confrontational and defensive, and the intent appears to be to challenge the previous speaker's assertions about understanding and interpreting facts related to Black heritage and possibly other social issues like racism and civil rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to strive to do no harm; it is confrontational and could be seen as dismissive or belittling. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others and could be interpreted as engaging in a form of verbal harassment or dismissiveness. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on challenging and potentially undermining the other person's perspective. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a personal attack by questioning the other person's ability to understand facts. [-2]