Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the conflict in Gaza and the killing of children. The tone is accusatory and emotional, aiming to condemn those who support the actions described in the linked article.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words, as it labels supporters as 'sociopaths,' which is a harmful and stigmatizing term. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it polarizes the issue by labeling supporters in a derogatory manner. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks by calling supporters 'sociopaths.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity by using inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.