The statement addresses a serious public issue involving the investigation of a child's death in a conflict zone, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is critical and seeks accountability, focusing on the appropriateness of an internal investigation by Israel into its own military actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises a critical issue that could lead to constructive outcomes if addressed properly. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on the need for an independent investigation rather than engaging in personal attacks or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the tragic death of a child and questioning the adequacy of the investigation process.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the appropriateness of Israel investigating itself, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to call for accountability and transparency, which can be seen as an effort to better society by advocating for justice.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise awareness about a significant issue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.