In reply to:
Lucho
@LucianoKay
·
139d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
139d
Sambhav Gupta
@sambhavgupta6
·
140d
The statement is part of a public discourse about the accuracy and presentation of data in AI model performance graphs. The tone is casual and slightly frustrated, indicated by the use of informal language and an expletive. The intent is to point out a perceived flaw in the graph's y-axis not starting at zero, which can be misleading in data visualization.
- The statement does not cause harm but uses an expletive, which might be considered unprofessional or offensive by some. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out a potential issue with the graph, which can help others interpret the data more accurately. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the content of the graph rather than attacking individuals. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.