Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47

Score -15

@AvikonHadoop @StuartJRitchie It would be a real service to the field to have it back to GPT or GPT-2, and with Y-axis from 0 to 100, @StuartJRitchie.

6/22/2024, 3:42:27 PM

In reply to:

Avik Dey

@AvikonHadoop

138d

@GaryMarcus think that was from @StuartJRitchie. from the plot looks like he might have the full version already.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

138d

Reward for anyone who can find the source of this graph and plot it with reasonable accuracy back to the original GPT in 2018.

My guess is that 2024 will look like a tiny blip in that context.

Sambhav Gupta

@sambhavgupta6

140d

@GregKamradt maybe GPT5 is not that impressive as we imagine it to be

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the capabilities of different versions of GPT models and their representation in a graph. It suggests a modification to the graph for better clarity and accuracy, which contributes to the ongoing discourse about AI development and evaluation. The tone is constructive and aims to improve the quality of information being shared.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm and instead aims to improve the accuracy of the information being discussed, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By suggesting a way to improve the graph, the statement promotes understanding and clarity, which aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a specific improvement to the graph without attacking any individual, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]