In reply to:
Naveen Rao
@NaveenGRao
·
134d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
134d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the ethical and legal responsibilities of a company operating under the guise of a nonprofit. It critiques the actions of a public figure and organization, thus contributing to public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises concerns about ethical practices, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the actions and policies of the organization rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and accountability by highlighting discrepancies between the company's actions and its stated nonprofit goals. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out specific issues with the company's practices. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly question and critique the actions of a public figure and organization. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.