The statement and accompanying image suggest a critique of OpenAI, implying that while OpenAI is legally and morally a nonprofit organization, it does not operate as one in practice. The tone is critical and suggests a discrepancy between OpenAI's stated mission and its actual operations.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative assessment of OpenAI's practices, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but questions the integrity of OpenAI, which could be seen as a form of public accountability rather than harassment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide specific examples or evidence, which could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.