In reply to:
Eileen🇺🇲🇺🇦🟦
@Eileenleftnotri
·
381d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
381d
The statement 'There is no evidence of that' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the actions and character of Julian Assange, a public figure, and the implications of his actions on public issues such as privacy, security, and human rights.
- The statement does not cause harm directly but challenges a potentially harmful assertion, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the lack of evidence rather than engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the validity of a serious accusation, encouraging a fact-based discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the claim without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a fact-based discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.