In reply to:
Michael Donnelly
@thissmallplanet
·
381d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
381d
The statement 'None of that is what he was prosecuted for' is a response to a discussion about Julian Assange's role in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and his prosecution. The conversation involves public figures and addresses significant public issues, including election interference, freedom of the press, and legal accountability. The tone of the statement is corrective, aiming to clarify the reasons behind Assange's prosecution.
- The statement strives to correct a perceived misunderstanding, which can be seen as an attempt to do no harm by providing accurate information. However, it does not provide detailed evidence or context, which could limit its effectiveness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the facts of the prosecution rather than engaging in personal attacks or speculation. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By attempting to clarify a point of contention, the statement promotes understanding and can foster a more informed discussion. However, its brevity may limit its ability to fully explain the complexities involved. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. It maintains a focus on the issue at hand rather than the individuals involved. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.