Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/25/2024, 6:05:24 PM
X
In reply to:
Black Knight
@BlackKn74938916
·
380d
@marwilliamson @marwilliamson where's the freedom of our nation when we are being dictated by what we can see here and talk about?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
380d
How controlled does our media have to be before we admit how much it’s controlled? We have a media dictatorship in America today, mainstream media partnering with political elites to control narratives, suppress candidacies, and manipulate our politics. The first step in…
Saagar Enjeti
@esaagar
·
380d
CNN has told Breaking Points it is NOT allowing independent media channels to stream their presidential debate despite granting permission to *all other terrestrial news organizations*

A blatant protection racket to protect elite media

The statement by @BlackKn74938916 engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about media control and the susceptibility of the public to disinformation. The tone is critical and reflective, suggesting a need for greater awareness and skepticism among the public regarding media narratives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises awareness about potential manipulation, which can be seen as a positive contribution to public discourse. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By highlighting the ease with which people can be misled, the statement promotes understanding and encourages critical thinking. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of both media practices and public gullibility, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on broader issues. [+1]