Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57

The statement in question is a brief, supportive reply to a conversation about political leadership and influence. It does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or societal concerns. Instead, it appears to be a personal encouragement directed at an individual, suggesting they check their direct messages for further communication. The tone is positive and supportive, but it does not contribute to the broader civic dialogue or public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is supportive. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging the recipient. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in any form of criticism or dialogue, constructive or otherwise.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not involve any mistakes to acknowledge or correct.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment in a substantive way.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform for significant public discourse.