The statement expresses a strong opinion about the Microsoft AI CEO's comments on the use of online content for AI training, and calls for a boycott. It engages with a public issue related to copyright and the ethical use of online content, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as inciting action against Microsoft, which may have economic implications.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on expressing frustration and calling for action. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a call for a boycott without offering a platform for discussion or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, but the call for a boycott could be seen as a responsible use of influence depending on one's perspective. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.