Gary Marcus

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 0

The statement expresses a strong opinion about the Microsoft AI CEO's comments on the use of online content for AI training, and calls for a boycott. It engages with a public issue related to copyright and the ethical use of online content, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as inciting action against Microsoft, which may have economic implications.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on expressing frustration and calling for action. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a call for a boycott without offering a platform for discussion or understanding. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, but the call for a boycott could be seen as a responsible use of influence depending on one's perspective. [+1]