The statement by Gary Marcus addresses the current state of AI technology and the behavior of AI industry leaders, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is somewhat critical and skeptical, aiming to highlight a perceived shift in the narrative from current capabilities to future promises.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does criticize the behavior of AI industry leaders. This criticism is not personal but rather directed at a broader trend, so it does not violate this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a focus on industry practices rather than individuals, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could be seen as promoting understanding by pointing out a trend in the AI industry. However, it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI industry's narrative shift. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the broader issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to critique industry practices. It maintains integrity by addressing a relevant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.