Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and the associated conversations constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant policy decision and its implications on public perception and international relations. The tone of the statement and the conversations is critical and accusatory, reflecting deep-seated concerns about the implications of the amendment on the recognition of Palestinian casualties and broader issues of racism and genocide denial.
- The statement and conversations aim to highlight perceived harm caused by the amendment, suggesting it undermines the recognition of Palestinian casualties. This aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by bringing attention to potential negative consequences. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversations accuse the House of anti-Palestinian racism and genocide denial, which could be seen as not respecting the dignity of others. However, they also aim to defend the dignity of Palestinians by ensuring their casualties are acknowledged. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The conversations promote empathy and compassion for Palestinians by highlighting the importance of recognizing their casualties. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversations engage in strong criticism of the amendment and its supporters, which could be seen as personal attacks. However, they also engage in dialogue about the implications of the policy. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The conversations use their platform to bring attention to a significant issue, aiming to influence public opinion and policy for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The conversations uphold the principles of free speech by openly criticizing the amendment and its implications, using their platform responsibly to raise awareness about a contentious issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.