Rashida Tlaib

Rank 2 of 47

Score 222

Reposted by Rashida Tlaib

Rep. Rashida Tlaib on effort to erase Gaza death toll:
"There is so much anti-Palestinian racism in this chamber that my colleagues don't even want to acknowledge that Palestinians exist at all. Not when they're alive—and now, not even when they're dead."

Mohammed Khader

@MohammedKhaderr

547d

The House of Representatives is considering an amendment to an annual appropriations act that would prohibit funds for the international affairs budget from being used by State Department to cite any number of Palestinians killed by Israel in Gaza.

This is genocide denial.

6/27/2024, 1:59:46 PM

The statement by Rep. Rashida Tlaib addresses a significant public issue, specifically the recognition and acknowledgment of Palestinian casualties in Gaza. The tone is accusatory and critical, highlighting perceived anti-Palestinian racism within the legislative chamber. The statement aims to bring attention to what the speaker views as a deliberate erasure of Palestinian existence and suffering. The linked conversation and image provide context, indicating that the House of Representatives is considering an amendment that would prohibit the State Department from citing statistics from the Gaza Health Ministry, which the speaker interprets as genocide denial.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to highlight and address harm, specifically the erasure of Palestinian casualties, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone may contribute to divisiveness. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on a public issue rather than targeting individuals. However, the strong language could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy for Palestinians by highlighting their suffering and the perceived erasure of their existence. However, the accusatory tone may hinder constructive dialogue. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of colleagues, which is a form of public discourse. However, the tone is accusatory and could be seen as a personal attack, which does not align with constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses the speaker's platform to bring attention to a significant issue, which aligns with using influence for the betterment of society. However, the tone may polarize rather than unite. [+1]