Gary Marcus

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score -24

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the legal and ethical implications of AI and copyright law, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of understanding rather than a personal attack. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by suggesting further reading on the topic, which can be seen as an attempt to foster informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived misunderstanding and suggesting resources for better understanding. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion on a public issue. [+1]