Gary Marcus

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score -24
6/27/2024, 9:32:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Ryan Hickman
@ryanmhickman
·
125d
@GaryMarcus @Rahll @marcus @rahlll @IEEESpectrum IANAL but have spoken to several trusted ones on this.

It also makes sense. Pen and paint manufacturers aren't violating copyright if you draw Mickey Mouse for profit. AI is just a fancy form of pen and paint, so don't violate copyright by asking it to make protected works.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
125d
@ryanmhickman @Rahll 1. I don’t think you understand fair use.

2. You should really read @marcus and @rahlll in @IEEESpectrum on “if they ask”
Ryan Hickman
@ryanmhickman
·
125d
@GaryMarcus @Rahll He's correct though.

The user of the AI is to blame if they ask the AI to reproduce a copyrighted work.

Feel free to advocate for changing the law, but that's what it says today.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
125d
I honestly don’t know if I can keep using Microsoft products when their AI CEO says stuff like this.

Anyone want to join in a boycott? Cc @Rahll

First they came for the artists and the
writers, and then the voiceover actors, now it’s the musicians. Soon it will be everyone.
Ed Newton-Rex
@ednewtonrex
·
125d
Microsoft AI CEO says the social contract of content on the open web "is fair use", "anyone can copy it", it's "freeware".

This is categorically false. Content released online is still protected by copyright. You can't copy it for any purpose you like simply because it's on the…

The statement 'I will let @neilturkewitz straighten you out' is part of a larger conversation about copyright and AI, which is a public issue. The tone is somewhat dismissive and implies that the person being addressed does not understand the issue and needs correction from an authority figure.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show much respect for the dignity of the person being addressed.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it implies that the person being addressed is wrong and needs correction. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the other person's viewpoint without addressing their arguments. [-1]