The statement addresses the role of a debate moderator and the importance of challenging falsehoods, which is a public issue related to the integrity of public discourse and debates.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that failing to challenge lies can be harmful to the integrity of the debate. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes the idea that moderators should foster understanding and truth by challenging falsehoods, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of debate moderation practices without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating for responsible moderation to ensure truthful discourse. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.