The statement addresses a public issue by questioning the appropriateness of a convicted felon running for President and criticizing the debate moderators for not addressing this issue. The tone is critical and aims to provoke thought about the integrity of the electoral process.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of the debate moderators and the candidate. It does not appear to intend harm but rather to highlight a perceived oversight.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on a public figure's criminal record, which is a matter of public interest.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out what the author sees as a significant issue that should be addressed in public discourse.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the debate moderators and the candidate but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue at hand.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to bring attention to a matter they believe is important for the betterment of society, specifically the integrity of the electoral process.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise a public concern.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.