Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a critique of the media's role in moderating a public debate, specifically accusing them of failing to correct misinformation from a convicted felon. The tone is highly critical and uses strong language to express frustration.
- The statement uses strong and potentially harmful language, which could be seen as doing harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on expressing frustration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational tone and does not offer a solution. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to the strong language used. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.