Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses the issue of balance in moderation and the importance of truth in public discourse. It argues that treating both sides of a debate as equal when one side is demonstrably false is not fair but rather a form of malpractice. The tone is assertive and the intent is to advocate for prioritizing truth over a false sense of balance.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for truth, which can prevent the spread of misinformation. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the importance of truth, which can foster a more informed and compassionate society. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the practice of false balance in moderation. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society by promoting truth over false balance. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by advocating for truth and integrity in public discourse. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.