The statement expresses a concern about the absence of discussion on artificial intelligence (AI) during a debate, suggesting that this omission is a significant oversight. The tone is critical and implies that AI is an important issue that should have been addressed.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of the debate's content rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of discussing AI, which can foster awareness and empathy towards the implications of AI in society. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived shortcoming in the debate without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for the inclusion of AI in public discourse, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society, emphasizing the need to address significant technological issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to call attention to an important topic. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.