In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
William Johnson
@notionport
·
370d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
370d
The statement and the linked content constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of AI and its importance in political discourse. The statement critiques the lack of discussion on AI in a political debate and calls for a president who understands AI, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It critiques the lack of AI discussion in a political debate, which is a valid concern. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of AI in political discourse. It encourages readers to consider the implications of AI in governance. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political debate without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to advocate for a more informed political discourse on AI, which can be seen as an effort for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss an important public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.