Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement and image contribute to public discourse by engaging in a discussion about the qualifications and effectiveness of a public advisor, which is relevant to public policy and governance. The tone is positive and supportive, aiming to highlight the competence of a specific advisor in the context of a broader conversation about policy expertise.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm and is positive in nature, praising the advisor's competence. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by sharing a positive personal experience with the advisor, which can foster a more nuanced view of public officials. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a counterpoint to a previous critical comment, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]