Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement juxtaposes two legal decisions, highlighting a perceived inconsistency in the legal system. The tone is critical and aims to provoke thought about the justice system's priorities and fairness.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as provocative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as indirectly critical of individuals involved in the legal decisions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting perceived inconsistencies, but it does so in a critical manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but is critical of the legal system. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a societal issue, aiming to provoke thought and discussion. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.