In reply to:
Trent Fowler
@Trent_STEMpunk
·
118d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
118d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the limitations and future directions of AI technology, a significant public issue. The tone is analytical and aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about AI development.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is focused on a technical discussion about AI limitations and future directions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by addressing specific issues in AI development, such as data limits, outlier problems, and the need for metacognition and symbolic reasoning. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question in a technical discussion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.