Gary Marcus

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 43
7/2/2024, 5:36:41 AM
X
In reply to:
Emad
@EMostaque
路
115d
Only wall being hit is the one with my head when I read those takes.
Emad
@EMostaque
路
115d
Gen AI will never understand physics and how stuff works, this is all an illusion and will never improve 馃檮
Smoke-away
@SmokeAwayyy
路
115d
Runway Gen-3 is feeling less like a rehash of the training data and more like a world simulator.

The man's movements. The attempt to to get the space sprinkler physics right. His eye/face movements at the end.

Very impressive model that creates its own impressions of the world.

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about the capabilities and limitations of generative AI models, which is a public issue in the field of technology and artificial intelligence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be perceived as disrespectful.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and sarcastic.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does so in a sarcastic manner, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue.聽[-1]