Gary Marcus

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 54
7/2/2024, 5:37:42 AM
X
In reply to:
Charlie + (Byte/8) + Me
@AdeptAdaptor
路
114d
@GaryMarcus @EMostaque Plus there are far more efficient and accurate ways to simulate physics within computers. I don't know why these people keep wanting to shoehorn "machine learning" and GenAI into applications where it's neither needed nor wanted.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
115d
@EMostaque Not sure whether you are being sarcastic but there is something very weird towards the end, almost like a pane of glass has appeared from nowhere. That鈥檚 an artifact of doing inference in pixel space, not what you would get if you had modeled the world from the scene鈥檚 beginning
Emad
@EMostaque
路
115d
Gen AI will never understand physics and how stuff works, this is all an illusion and will never improve 馃檮
Smoke-away
@SmokeAwayyy
路
115d
Runway Gen-3 is feeling less like a rehash of the training data and more like a world simulator.

The man's movements. The attempt to to get the space sprinkler physics right. His eye/face movements at the end.

Very impressive model that creates its own impressions of the world.

The statement in question is a reply in a thread discussing the capabilities and limitations of generative AI in simulating physics. The tone is dismissive and sarcastic, indicated by the use of the eye-rolling emoji. The intent appears to be to criticize the perceived overconfidence or misplaced enthusiasm of others in the conversation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as disrespectful.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the concerns of others without offering constructive feedback.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses sarcasm, which can be interpreted as a form of personal attack or ad hominem argument.聽[-2]