In reply to:
Texan for life.
@astroturf_tex
·
102d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
102d
The statement 'He did not and will not do anything to improve those things.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the effectiveness of a political figure in addressing societal problems such as poverty and economic hardship.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is critical of a political figure's actions or inactions. It does not violate this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical without offering constructive solutions or fostering dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions or inactions of the political figure.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique a political figure, which can be seen as an attempt to hold them accountable. However, it does not offer constructive alternatives or solutions.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a critical opinion responsibly.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.