David Leavitt 🎲🎮🧙♂️🌈
@David_Leavitt
·
102d
The statement addresses a significant public issue, specifically the implications of a Supreme Court ruling and allegations against a former president, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is urgent and cautionary, aiming to raise awareness about potential abuses of power and their consequences.
- The statement aims to inform the public about a serious issue, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by raising awareness. However, the alarming nature of the statement could incite fear or panic, which might be considered harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It references a public figure and a public issue, which are generally considered fair game in public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could be seen as promoting understanding and empathy by highlighting potential abuses of power and their impact on society. However, the accusatory tone might detract from fostering compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It references a specific allegation made by a former Defense Secretary, which is a factual basis for the discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about a significant public issue. However, the inclusion of a potentially sensationalist claim could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.