In reply to:
The statement is a factual correction and provides a historical context for the term 'cognitive architecture.' It engages in a constructive dialogue by providing a source for further reading, thus promoting understanding and knowledge sharing.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing factual information and a source for verification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by sharing knowledge and encouraging further reading. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by correcting a misconception without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.