Gary Marcus

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 68
7/7/2024, 3:34:37 PM
X
In reply to:
John Brownlow
@JohnBrownlow
·
108d
@GaryMarcus
John Brownlow
@JohnBrownlow
·
108d
https://spectrum.ieee.org/chatgp…
Grady Booch
@Grady_Booch
·
108d
In other words, ChatGPT is largely useless for generating code for real and enduring economically interesting software-intensive systems. https://spectrum.ieee.org/chatgp…

The statement 'I saw but it is 3.5 not 4, so I didn’t repost cc @Grady_Booch' is a response to a discussion about the effectiveness of ChatGPT in generating code, particularly in relation to a study shared via an IEEE Spectrum article. The statement itself is a minor correction regarding a numerical detail (3.5 vs. 4) and does not engage substantively with the broader public issue of AI's capabilities in coding. Therefore, it does not constitute public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it is a factual correction.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but is also not a personal attack.