The statement addresses a substantive issue in the field of machine learning, specifically the interpretability of pure LLMs (Large Language Models). It references a detailed review by a researcher, indicating an engagement with ongoing academic and technical discussions. The tone is constructive and aims to promote understanding and improvement in the field.
- The statement does no harm and is focused on constructive criticism and improvement. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing a detailed review and encouraging the field to improve its interpretability. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by critiquing current approaches and suggesting improvements without personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote better practices in the field of machine learning, which can benefit society by making AI more interpretable and trustworthy. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important issues in AI. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.