In reply to:
Shane Wilhoite
@ShaneWilhoite
·
89d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
89d
The statement engages in a discussion about political campaigns and the actions of Democratic leaders, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and suggests a sense of urgency and frustration with the current political process.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the critical tone could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Democratic leaders but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.