+5
The statement by @ewarren addresses a public issue, specifically the expansion of the Supreme Court, and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is assertive and the intent is to advocate for a specific policy change. The content focuses on historical precedent and current political context to argue for court expansion.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is focused on a policy issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by providing historical context and rationale for court expansion. However, it could be seen as lacking in empathy and compassion towards those who may disagree.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Supreme Court and the Republican party's actions. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change that the speaker believes will benefit society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.