Gary Marcus

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 37
7/10/2024, 1:58:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Alejandra Caraballo 🥥 🌴
@Esqueer_
·
104d
@GaryMarcus @wellingmax What about multiagentic AI? It seems like that is far more promising than the brute force method of scaling to get AGI which has hit a wall.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
104d
Please don’t reduce the greatest scientific-engineering question of our time—will scaling take us to AGI?—to a kind of “he-said, she-said”, as the otherwise brilliant @wellingmax does below.

Instead, consider the actual evidence.

•  Although we saw massive leaps from GPT-2 to…
Max Welling
@wellingmax
·
104d
As I read these posts I find it intriguing to see how confident people are about their beliefs; on both sides, while the future fate of AI seems truly very uncertain to me. I see parallels with religion (my God the only real one). At least one must have badly calibrated beliefs.

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the future of AI, specifically the reliability of multiagentic AI versus current large language models (LLMs). The tone is analytical and the intent is to contribute to the ongoing debate about AI development strategies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral, analytical comment. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by contributing to the discussion on AI reliability. It does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion, but it does not detract from them either. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the reliability of AI agents without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by contributing thoughtfully to the public discourse on AI. [+2]