Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score -6

The statement '@PeacekeeperBH @wellingmax agreed' is a brief agreement in a conversation about the future of AI and the limitations of current scaling laws. The tone is neutral and the intent is to show concurrence with the points made by @PeacekeeperBH and @wellingmax. The content is minimal and does not provide any substantive engagement with the public issue being discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, but it also does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not involve any mistakes that need acknowledgment or correction.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, but it also does not misuse influence.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]