Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score -6

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the future of AI, specifically the debate on whether scaling current AI models will lead to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The tone is analytical and inquisitive, seeking to understand the empirical evidence and the progress in the field.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a reasoned inquiry into the progress of AI research. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by asking for evidence and intermediate results, which can foster a more informed discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the lack of impressive intermediate results without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful debate on a significant public issue. [+1]