In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
102d
The statement and the linked article by Gary Marcus constitute public discourse as they engage substantively with the public issue of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its development. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the progress and expectations surrounding AGI, which is a significant societal and technological concern.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual and analytical discussion about the state of AGI development. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing evidence and analysis regarding the progress of AGI, which can help manage public expectations and foster a more informed dialogue. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the hype surrounding AGI without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue rather than individuals. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform and educate the public about AGI development. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.