The statement 'Still further signs of the Great AI Retrenchment' refers to a conversation about OpenAI's new scale to track AI progress, which does not mention AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). The tone is somewhat critical and implies skepticism about the progress towards AGI. The intent appears to be to highlight a perceived lack of transparency or progress in the field of AI, particularly in relation to AGI.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critical observation but does not use harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding and empathy by encouraging a discussion about the transparency and progress in AI development. However, it does not explicitly promote compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the absence of AGI in the new scale. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise a valid concern about AI progress tracking. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.