In reply to:
‘Ala’uddin ibn Al-‘Attar 🔻
@qistantiniyah
·
102d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
102d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI development, specifically addressing the expectations and realities surrounding AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to temper public expectations about AI capabilities.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it aims to clarify misconceptions about AI, which can be seen as beneficial. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a realistic perspective on AI capabilities, which can foster a more informed public dialogue. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the high expectations surrounding AI without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform the public about the limitations of current AI technology. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.