Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes the influence of wealthy individuals on the democratic process, specifically through campaign finance. It argues that large donations from billionaires undermine democracy and turn elections into auctions. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived flaws in the campaign finance system.
- The statement aims to highlight a perceived harm to democracy caused by large financial contributions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or harassment but criticizes the actions of a public figure, which is within the bounds of public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the issue of campaign finance and its impact on democracy, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the campaign finance system and does not resort to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a public issue, aligning with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.