In reply to:
Liv Boeree
@Liv_Boeree
·
101d
Paul Graham
@paulg
·
101d
Liv Boeree
@Liv_Boeree
·
101d
Paul Graham
@paulg
·
102d
The statement and the preceding conversation revolve around the topic of being blocked on social media, which can be considered a public issue related to online behavior and freedom of expression. The tone is conversational and somewhat lighthearted, with a hint of frustration about being blocked for expressing differing views.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a response to a shared experience, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by sharing a common experience of being blocked for differing views. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the behavior rather than the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.