In reply to:
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
101d
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
101d
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
101d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
101d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with public issues, specifically the political influence on the tech industry and the performance of political parties in relation to Silicon Valley's entrepreneurial environment. The tone is critical and aims to challenge the assertion that Democrats are solely to blame for the tech industry's failings.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is critical but not harmful. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a counter-argument to the blame placed on Democrats, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, challenging the previous assertions without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in a public debate. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.