In reply to:
Sharon Goldman
@sharongoldman
·
101d
@emilymbender@dair-community.social on Mastodon
@emilymbender
·
102d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the debate on the environmental impact of AI and the potential benefits of domain-specific models versus general AI. The tone is critical but aims to clarify a distinction that could lead to more effective solutions.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on a constructive critique rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by distinguishing between different types of AI and their potential impacts. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the argument rather than attacking the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.