In reply to:
The Prussian
@ThePrussian1
·
471d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
471d
The statement by @ThePrussian1 and the subsequent replies constitute public discourse as they engage in a debate about a public issue involving political affiliations, gun violence, and media representation. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, with an intent to challenge the credibility of the other party's argument.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and confrontational, which can escalate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and borders on cyberbullying by using dismissive language like 'cope.' [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on discrediting the other party. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and dismissive language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.