Brandy Zadrozny
@BrandyZadrozny
·
100d
The statement and the referenced conversations constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue involving a shooting incident, political affiliations, and the subsequent blame placed on different political groups. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to clarify misunderstandings and highlight the misattribution of blame.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could contribute to polarization by emphasizing political blame.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying the situation and correcting misinformation, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the misattribution of blame without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.