Brandy Zadrozny
@BrandyZadrozny
·
100d
In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
100d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
101d
The statement and the conversation it is part of constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue involving a shooting incident, its motivations, and the political implications. The tone of the statement is analytical and speculative, aiming to understand the motivations behind the incident. The intent appears to be to clarify the motivations and to challenge the narrative that blames the political left without evidence.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the context involves a sensitive issue that could be inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity to some extent but discusses personal motivations and family dynamics, which could be seen as intrusive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on analysis and critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue and critique without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to challenge a potentially misleading narrative. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.