Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 266
7/18/2024, 2:25:44 PM
X
In reply to:
K
@taskmaster_K
·
71d
Wow. No. They give their audience permission to publicly hate things, and encourage them to feel like hate IS American values. It is not love, magic, loyalty, patriotism, or commendable. This is why I don’t trust you.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
71d
There is a genius to the Republican convention that Democrats shouldn’t criticize, we should learn from:

They’re giving their audience permission to love this country.

It’s a no cynicism zone provided by some of the most cynical people in the world; an almost loving…

The statement 'You might want to read what I actually said again' is a direct response to a previous comment in a conversation about political conventions and their impact on public sentiment. The tone is defensive and suggests a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the original statement. The intent appears to be to clarify or correct the record.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement attempts to engage in constructive dialogue by suggesting a re-evaluation of the previous comment. However, it does not provide any substantive argument or evidence to support its position, which limits its effectiveness in promoting constructive criticism and dialogue. It avoids personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, which is positive.
  2. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implicitly acknowledges that there might have been a misunderstanding or miscommunication, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. However, it does not explicitly admit any fault or provide a clear correction.